The chinese insider trading exists in its system and society , hi beginning of monetary market , the politics of government always affect the developing ; the government plays both the enforcer and the object . in fact , the government wastes the economic investment . meanwhile , that the ancient moral of china is even obstinate provides the fertilizer of insider trading 在金融市场发展的初期,政府的经济政策直接影响金融市场的发展,尤其在我国证券市场属于行政主导型体制,政府扮演着多重角色,既是执法者又是被执行者,处于二难境地,结果是该管的事情没管好,不该管的事情却卖力的管,无形中加大了经济投入成本,得不偿失。
The author then analyzes the basis of the consumer ' s right to claim compensation in foreign countries and extracts some valuable knowledge from foreign practices that , from the author ' s perspective , is applicable to china ' s circumstances . based on the above studies , the author finally puts forward corresponding policy suggestions on legislating consumer compensation claims rights . from the perspective of judicial practice , she first suggests establishing small claims courts favorable to consumers ; second , she calls for legislating an exemplary loss compensation system ; third , she seeks to establish a group litigation system that will further benefit consumers in claming compensation ; and finally , the author argues that the mature legal consciousness of people is the key to implementing sound legislation 最后,在前面分析研究的基础上,笔者针对中国消费者索赔权行使的现状及有关法律法规,从战略的高度提出了相应的政策建议,认为应首先从司法实践方面,建立便于当事人诉讼的小额法庭,完善当前的诉讼模式;其次,要完善惩罚性损害赔偿制度的立法;再次,在诉讼制度上确立更加有利于保护消费者行使索赔权的群体诉讼制度;最后指出,完善的制度要依靠人来实施,没有良好的法律意识是无法贯彻执行好立法的本意,应努力引导和推动消费者和执法者加强维权意识的提高。
The criterion of judging the confusion is a matter of the extent or the height of the level of the ip protection for a country . the responsibility of the legislators is to make out " easy - to - operate " regulations take into consideration the public interests , the height of the level of the economic situation of the county , the extension of the education and civilization of the mass and the international factors . the judges should balance the interests of the consumers , the producers , the sellers and the society to determine the question of the confusion based on the existing laws and in the direction of the current policy of the country 判断是否存在混淆的问题,实际上是知识产权保护水平被确定在什么样的高度的问题,对于立法者而言,认定混淆的原则与社会公共利益、国家的经济发展水平、民众的文明程度、国际上和国家间关系等因素密切相关,应当据此制订尽可能操作性强的规则;对于执法者而言,由于认定混淆的主观性很大,因此法官应当根据既定的法律和政策的导向,权衡消费者、生产者、经营者和社会的综合利益,进行混淆的认定和判断。
Understandably , the hkis s proposal involves a number of complicated policy and legal issues such as the legal status and institutional arrangement of the proposed bat , its interface with the existing lands tribunal which also deals with building management disputes ; its jurisdiction vis - vis bd which is the statutory authority under the buildings ordinance ; as well as the resource implications arising from the setting up of the bat 但由于该建议涉及复杂的政策及法律问题,包括该审裁处的法律地位及运作架构,与现时同样可以处理楼宇管理及维修纠纷的土地审裁处的关系,与屋宇署作为建筑物条例执法者的权限关系,以及所需资源等问题。