ONOFF
划词翻译
导航
建议反馈
词典App

刑法上的英文

  • criminally
  • penally

"查查词典"手机版

千万人都在用的超大词汇词典翻译APP

  • 例句与用法
  • When subjects of joint crime are composed of natural persons and corporations , they have particularity . judging this kind of subject of joint crime is very difficult . when subjects of joint crime are composed of general subjects of crime and special subjects of crime , they have relativity
    无论是刑事诉讼法的规定,还是刑事诉讼的运行规律以及刑事诉讼的实践,都会导致刑法上的犯罪主体不成为刑事诉讼法上的“犯罪主体”和刑事诉讼法上的“犯罪主体”不一定是刑法上的犯罪主体。
  • The writer focally discussed such questions as the historical evolution of typical crime of shield in china , discussed relevant basic theoretical problems , the questions attentions paid to in judicial view and the legislative perfection of the typical crime of shield , etc . though the criminal law whenever and wherever has relevant regulations concerning crime of shield , the crime of shield is stipulated definitely in criminal law , which is the achievement acquired by mode and modern legislation
    本文着重讨论了我国典型包庇犯罪的历史变迁、在理论上存在争议的有关基本问题、司法认定中应当注意的问题及典型包庇犯罪的立法完善等问题。古今中外的刑法虽对包庇犯罪都有相应的规定,但在刑法上明文规定“包庇”犯罪则是近现代立法的结果。
  • Firstly , the author refers that the premises of defining " act " is the change of research thinking manner and discusses concept separation based on two layers , the prototype of the crime and the model of the crime , with an eye of fact - value segregative dualistic thinking way
    笔者首先指出界定“行为”概念的前提是要转换研究该问题的思维方式,并就事实?价值分离的二元思维下的犯罪原型和犯罪模型层面的划分问题作了具体论述,然后分别就不同层面的行为概念? “自然行为” 、 “犯罪行为” 、 “刑法上的行为”的具体内涵提出了笔者的见解。
  • The author of this paper believes that these differences ascribe to the understanding of an essential problem , that is , reasons and levels about criminal law ' s intervention in embezzlement . how to differ civil limitations and criminal ones of embezzlement , whether the criminal intervention in embezzlement should be extended or limited , scholars " different decisions towards these two problems lead to different understanding towards embezzlement
    笔者认为,学者们在一些问题上的分歧归根于一个根本问题的认识,即刑法介入侵占罪的理由和程度,如何区分侵占行为在民法上与刑法上的界限,刑法对侵占行为的介入是扩大还是限制,学者们对这个问题的不同取向决定了对侵占罪的不同理解。
  • Aggravated consequential offense is a criminal ` pattern in which a constitutive act of a crime brings in unrequisite aggravated results and severe penalty . though there are two outcomes stemmed from same behavior , according to our law , it cannot be classified to two criminalities . it is so complicated that the debate on it has been never ending , especially on its essentials
    刑法上对于一个具体的犯罪发生了加重结果而刑法加重其刑的犯罪称之为结果加重犯,传统刑法理论对于结果加重犯做“两分结构”的解读,即由一个故意的基本犯罪和一个加重结果的过失犯构成。
  • The common characteristic of the traditional theories about the act researches is researching the concept of act in criminal law with the restrained thinking way of monism , i . e . onefold factual , onefold valued , or fact - value integrative methodology , which result in that it can not explain some especial act forms in the criminal laws , that it only explain those narrowly but can not withstand careful analysis , or that it only extends to explain all kinds of act forms , which does not accord with the daily thinking manners . this paper recognizes and redefines the concept of act in the research of the criminal law based on the suspicion and consideration of research methodology , in a fact - value segregative dualistic thinking way , in relation to analyse and comprehension of characteristic of some special act forms , such as " holding " , " omission "
    传统的行为理论的研究都有这样一个共同的特点,即局限于一元论的思维方式,以单纯事实的,单纯价值的,抑或事实? ?价值一体化的方法论,来研究刑法理论中的“行为”概念,结果导致要么是无法解释刑法上特殊的行为形式,要么只是表面上牵强附会却经不起深入推敲,要么仅追求能有张力地解释各种行为方式却脱离了人们认识的思维习惯。本文正是基于对研究方法的质疑和反思,采用事实? ?价值分离的二元论思维方式,结合分析理解“持有” 、 “不作为”等刑法中特殊行为形式的特征,重新认识和界定了刑法理论研究中的“行为”概念。
  • The forgotten property has the same meaning with the lost property in fact , presently both of them can not be strictly distinguished in the criminal law of our country . the definition of the hidden property in the criminal law , which includes the owner ' s unclear hidden property and clear hidden property , is different from that in the civil law
    因此,刑法上的埋藏物的概念与民法上的埋藏物的概念不同,二者是一种包含和被包含的关系,刑法上的埋藏物不仅包括所有权归属不明的埋藏物(即民法上的埋藏物) ,而且还包括所有权归属明确的埋藏物。
  • On 30th october 1995 , standing committee of national people ' s congress promulgated decision on correcting crime of falsely making out , counterfeiting or illegally selling specialized value - added - tax receipts . it is the first time that the criminal law of our country established the crime of falsely making out specialized vat receipts
    1995年10月30日,全国人大常委会颁行了《关于惩治虚开、伪造和非法出售增值税专用发票犯罪的决定》 ,这是我国刑法上第一次确立虚开增值税专用发票罪。
  • In the third chapter , i have analyzed specifically the factors that establishment of possession in criminal law need in our country . understanding of possession ' s fact and intention should be consistent with our legal system and convention of controlling and dominating property . different possession should have different specific contents in relationship of controlling and dominating property
    第三章具体分析了我国刑法上占有的成立在客观支配状态和占有意思上的要求,认为这应当同我国的法律体系和占有支配习惯联系起来,并且,不同类型的占有在控制支配关系的具体内容上应当有着不同的要求。
  • Base on national culture background , insist this nationality peculiar mode of think , proceed from our country ' s system of constitutive elements of crime , meet instant civilization and current society way with object of crime by oneself , and draw the conclusion : object of crime essentially is legal interest of criminal law . namely , the content of object of crime should be the interest that is protected by the criminal law ( legal interest ) . object of crime is the primary necessary condition of constitutive elements of crime , and is one of the module of the constitutive elements of crime m
    立足于本国文化背景,坚持本民族特有之思维方式,从我国现有的犯罪构成体系出发,以自己适应当下文明与当前社会的惯常方式对犯罪客体予以认识,并得出结论:犯罪客体实质就是刑法上的法益,即犯罪客体的内容应当是刑法所保护的利益(法益) ;犯罪客体是犯罪构成的首要要件,是犯罪构成之模块之一;若确失这一模块,犯罪构成模型必不完整。
  • 更多例句:  1  2  3  4  5
  • 其他语种释义
  • 推荐英语阅读
刑法上的英文翻译,刑法上英文怎么说,怎么用英语翻译刑法上,刑法上的英文意思,刑法上的英文刑法上 meaning in English刑法上的英文刑法上怎么读,发音,例句,用法和解释由查查在线词典提供,版权所有违者必究。
Last modified time:Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:29:56 GMT

说出您的建议或使用心得