quantise造句

例句与造句

1. Once you pick a photon frequency, then the number of photons for that frequency is quantised---- that is no fractions of photons are allowed . talk ) 12 : 17, 5 April 2010 ( UTC)
2. :: : The problem tends to be that time is a continuous function in the real world-but inside a computer it pretty much has to be quantised at a fairly gross level ( like maybe 1 / 100th second increments ).
3. But recently, in articles in the Scientific American to do with speculations on the nature of quantised theory of gravity, it was suggest that the Plank Unit can take on several geometrical orientations, so let s give them 12 possible  shapes.
4. As for proof of their existence, try researching the early advances in quantum theory-unless energy is quantised in discrete packets ( called photons ), the Photoelectric effect cannot be explained, and Blackbody radiation produces an infinite amount of energy-obviously ridiculous.
5. It likely calculated with a Floating point number representation which is a trade-off between range and precision, involving two LSBs ( its " smallest quantised approximations " ) in separately expressing the significand and exponent . talk ) 17 : 02, 10 February 2016 ( UTC)
6. It's difficult to find quantise in a sentence. 用quantise造句挺难的
7. :: Another exmaple, I see that ScienceApologist has continued his inquisition and unilaterally removed the scientific heresy of the " quantised redshift " paragraph from the Large-scale structure of the cosmos; no discusion or explanation, even though the paragraph was the subject of this mediation.
8. Research in string theory and several other approaches to quantum gravity suggest that spacetime must also have a dual continuous and discrete nature, but without the power to probe spacetime at sufficient energies it is difficult to measure its properties directly to find out how such a quantised spacetime should work.
9. Wilder recalled on " Violator " the band had relied heavily on sequencing; though the album used a great deal more live recorded audio than previous Depeche Mode releases, such as " Violator ", the audio had been quantised to the exact beats of the bars, resulting in a slick but sequenced feel.
10. But there is more because I want to normalise which I believe is " integral over all space of fn ( r, ?, ? ) fn * ( r, ?, ? ) " which I believe that this will only give non infinite integrals for certain values of a 0-and hence give " quantised solutions " ( as wanted ).
11. Auditory nerve impulses are discrete signalling events which cause synapses to release neurotransmitters to communicate to other neurons ( see here . ) The all-or-none quality of the impulse can lead to a misconception that neural signalling is somehow'digital'in nature, but in fact the timing and rate of these signalling events is not clocked or quantised in any way.
12. There are books on " Discordant redshifts " lab demonstrations of the Wolf effect [ http : / / adsabs . harvard . edu / cgi-bin / nph-bib _ query ? bibcode = 1987PhRvL . . 58.2649B & db _ key = AST & data _ type = HTML, and " hundreds " of peer-reviewed paper on intrinsic, non-cosmological and quantised redshifts.
13. But there are a number of phrases that he won't accept . ( a ) " Transverse redshift " appears to be mentioned in about 30 + articles and is included ( b ) " Intrinsic redshift " is mentioned in seven times as many references ( 210 + ) [ http : / / adsabs . harvard . edu / cgi-bin / dsp _ file ? id = 44514f831072, and not included ( c ) Periodic redshift / " Quantised redshifts " [ http : / / adsabs . harvard . edu / cgi-bin / dsp _ file ? id = 445151a31c0f get 200 + reference, and gets no mention.
14. we know that schrodinger equation is associated with a non relativistic single particle, moving onto relativistic description of the single particle, we get klein gordon equation and then modified dirac equation . Now in QFT, when we quantise the field we see that both Klein gordon n dirac pictures get modified to many particle picture and also a single particle state is described by the field . so my question is do we discard the wave associated with the particle here as given by schrodinger equation ( as here we r associating a field with single partice ) . if not, then also how do we get to know that is it a wave or field assocaited with the single particle . if the answer is that the particle is relativistic then it is field associated with it n if it is non relativistic then a wave is associated with it.
更多例句：  上一页